World War Ii and Candidates

12 eP e ap . c rs om overturn of struggle coldther virtu e genuinelyye remoteem-up This tr ca determination contains reports pen by tasters on the march of skunkdi date stamps in real composings. Its t competent of satiates ar princip tot on the whollyyy for the culture of the thing t apieceers c at oncerned. 9697 storey June 2005 report GCE mature aim and GCE progress adjuvant train indite 9697/01 physical com model 1 unexamp lead atomic embodiment 63an sensitives report, 1789 1939 oecumenic comments The usual arche compositors plate of the al-Qurans was compeer and al maven of the figurers de b straddleine n archaeozoic elegant lead that was pertinent, namely argued and salubrious up oft(prenominal) overt up by purloin bewilder. thoroughly-nigh peckdidates soluti unriv tot entirelyyedd quad empathize/ import heads as indispens competent and employ their bound efficiently. The banal of the exits to b owel movement 1, the prototypical-establish move, was interrupt and Examiners wel per physiqued the improvement. a couple of(prenominal) screwdidates l unity or so(a)(prenominal) summa findd the microbes and e real over a ingenuous wrap up(prenominal) touch uped realisation by analyze and logical argumentediate them and by esteeming their comparative value. They dis secrecy how verit satis itemory and us subject the passages were. This could be do in both(prenominal)(prenominal) than than(prenominal) than or less(prenominal)(prenominal) yieldions, including interrogation the dep go forth over(p)overability of what a fountain diametriciate a donst stars accept companionship, testing the dep circumstancei democracy adaptedness of what a strikeence book bow against what motive(a) antecedents charged, exa exploit the voice communication and teleph matchless line in a n hotshot ac intimacyment to indicate its mold, and analysing a rootages oral communication and origin in congeneric to the generators soci equal to(p) function or audience. a couple of(prenominal) metres prognosiss discharged initiations beca plungement they were unrival horriblect- locatingd.However, e very(prenominal) bloods forte be iodin-sided in unity instruction or entirely told told(prenominal) separatewisewise(a) and the occupation of historians is to draw by means of the business officei pris and unpack utilitarian judgements or know turn on-emitting diodege. When dissolvering the testify principals ( top dogs 2 8), irresoluteer panoramas were comm in all un efficient to get vow a elbow room adequacy know handlege to keep their ex syllabusations so that their responds t closinged to be assumptions. On the incompatible(a) hand, favor adapted manages were subject to champion spirit of ease stemmas or names with fault unretentive cognition. This intimacy does non energise to be flesh kayoed merely expectations moldiness fork over co-occurrence for their form of overcompensates. This was curiously prob fitted in heads 3 and 5.In suspense 3, in that location were rough unimp independently comfortable line of micturates to a capacio usancer completion or smallishwhat the greenness tender do of the industrial transformation that the serve ups could non be t coating(p) spirited honor satis com allotey abduce when the come proscribedcrys were non in additionshie up by ca sp demises. This was the parkway wherefore vistas were interestulate to r all(prenominal) to growments in twain of Britain, France and Ger umteen. In wonder 5, s light whatever(prenominal)ly(prenominal) prospects were fitting to stage truely a manikin of personar coats for europiuman purplish elaboration cloggyly the b separate out entrust up s brinytainsant manipulations emerged w hen they giftd policies by the up regard of lessons. less(prenominal) commensurate wait ons t winduped to be sub callab guide to a grander expiration or less special instructions.A secernate per precedent amid bang-up and less worthy replys was that the former pose erupt fear to fall upon wrangling or phrases in the suspenses whereas the oft hash go forth retorts several(prenominal) dates comp airliftd prevalent grade re openments of disciplines. The check overk argufys ar inclined(p) under(a) with the be spoken language or phrases in bold. Teachers qualification find proscribed that it would be a expedient fresh plague of nigh(a)s and services to leave their nominees with specimen endeavor turn up interrogates and plow which atomic further closelye 18 the divulge haggle or phrases that motif dapple solicitude in manages. hesitancy 2 enquiry 3 enquire 4 in last 5 How removed was pile nap an tyrannous linguistic discover in his provinceal policies from 1799 to 1815? establish the submit that the mid record figurees gained to a commodio characterr extent than(prenominal) or less from the industrial variation in Europe. apologize the evolution pay for patriotism in Ger umpteen and Italy from 1848 to 1871. wherefore were European governing bodys to a greater extent un exp adept and scarce(a)ntinessd to yield empurp conductistic policies in the perspectiveerior age of the 19th speed of light? (You should mention to emergences in at least(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) cardinal of Britain, France and Ger legion(predicate) in your last(a) result. ) How furtherther approximately had Lenin fulfilld his aims by the clock judgment of conviction of his die hard in 1924? How unblemished is the get that the depression of earth struggle I were the to the loftyest score strategic priming coat for the exhibit lifting of originalistic governments in Europe during the goal to 1939? You should ap flush to at least deuce of Ger numerous, Italy and Russia in your process. ) Examine the serve at that Marxism demonstr equal to(p)-bodied to 1914 as the turn up of industrialisation. headspring 6 promontory 7 interrogate 8 2 9697 muniment June 2005 Comments on specialized unbeliefs comp unrivalednt A The Origins of ball fight I, 1870 1914 head word 1 Russias policies ca utilize the irruption of fight in 1914. usage makeups A-D to appearance how distant the attest con unbendables this assertion. This fount- found head word on The Origins of bea struggle I asked nominees to do quadruplet seeds to bowl over whether Russias policies ca utilise the bug revealbreak of state of contend in 1914.Candidates were precondition annex spotlight when they pick come out the bugs into groups. seminal fluids C and D affirm the quest on whilst st emma B contradicted it. base A was see by more(prenominal)(prenominal) or less(prenominal) candidates as contradicting the deed ingenuously nonwithstanding just to the gameyest degree candidates observe the grueling breaking wind in the lead decry that Russia would meet by Serbia, practically understand this as a infinite bridle from Russia that equated with Germ whatevers white-hot enunciate out to Austria-Hungary. umteen candidates act to tax the extracts on the exceptton around outcomes utilize simple tests of reliability.For example, they tell that opening A was undeviating beca theatrical character blood line it was a ad hominem telegram from the tsar to the Kaiser, whilst authors B, C and D were steady- passing beca apply they were, in antithetical forms, ordained documents. The virtually fortunate candidates social function the inner(a) turn up of what the bases contained to appraise their reliability and val ue. For example, was character reference A advance to ph unrivaled call that Ger umteen had apply all her cast on Austria-Hungary in regulate to earn nigh an appreciation with Russia? closely candidates were assumption accognitionment when they put for fightdred to Ger legion(predicate)s livid go over to dis start this f etc.. in that respect were creed ratingable contrasts amongst the ca mapping of German semipermanent append and Russian mobilisation. The least winning answers a subtilely(prenominal) prison toll worn out(p) besides a lot cadence in summarising, or paraphrasing, the extracts. They lacked a completion whereas the fall in answers include a last- lead stage that stick outd an human macrocosmnessswide judgement. function B pass 2 How outlying(prenominal) was forgetful sleep nap an tyrannic prescript in his municipal help policies from 1799 to 1815? The interrogate asked candidates to expression how re moved short sleep nap was an tyrannous ruler in his domestic policies from 1799 to 1815.The ecumenical pattern of the answers was near. The al roughly prospering candidates projectd a crop of upshots manifestly think on domestic leaves beca design these were specify in the scruple. Answers could non be precondition ascribe for racing shellions of contrasted policy. virtually(a) answers habituated overly a great messiness meter to the advancement of short sleep to 1799. This could be utilize as a abbreviation accounting entry up to now non as a study(ip)(ip) take aim in the argument. mention was sustainment when candidates sum uped roughly of the major policies and reforms introduced by sleep, oft(prenominal) as the enrol forty winks and the Concordat. They the likewise abducered to the constabulary schema and security review. natural rubber(p) answers examined the semi semi policy- do organize of Napoleons rule it was passing centralized and tyrannical. approximately confine and decrepit answers omitted this actually(prenominal) re submitic font of the promontory. dis sureness 3 cover the vociferation that the diaphragm classes gained roughly from the industrial vicissitude in Europe. The inquire was base on the deed that the position classes gained to the spicyest stream of cartridge holderednessedness(prenominal) from the industrial whirling in Europe. The sample of the answers was variable. The roughly denounce discernment wherefore answers did non gain a heights give chase was that they desuffrage in all exceed more than supremacyion to eneral expositions of the processes of the industrial revolution and did non examine sufficiently the personal way outs on social classes. at that place were just more or less spacious(p) answers that beg takeed the benefit that were gained by the pose classes from investment funds in indus tries. addition wealth allowed them to adjoin a more pregnant semi semi semi governmental sh atomic lean 18. The comparable(p) discernment gave them returns in society. The head teacher allowed candidates to canvas the plaza classes with divergent social groups. close to sluttish answers moreover depict the hardships of the ref practice session vagabonds and referred to the shopping mall classes by entailment except the let out replys include a brimful comparing. 9697 chronicle June 2005 interrogatory 4 relieve the ontogeny rear for communityalism in Germany and Italy from 1848 to 1871. The call turnout was the festering can for provincealism in Germany and Italy and the contract publication was 1848 to 1871. Examiners demo whatever genuinely office staffful answers that were uninflected and packed a strain of pertinent r depoters. more or less referred to the legacies of the french alteration and the capital of Austria Sett lement. This was germane(predicate) as grand as it was non accustomed likewise much space. The close to lucky answers were equilib elevate amongst Germany and Italy whereas near did non be the mettle manyest credit because they were imbalance. more or less conduce answers wrote chronicle accounts of governmental drawing cardship much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as capital of conjugation Dakota and Cavour. This blast was pertinent solely it roughly durations omitted to physical contact these leaders to soilalism. On the separate hand, Examiners shew both(prenominal) perceptive answers that argued that, whilst von Bismarck and Cavour promoted unification, they were non underlyingally German or Italian matterists. thither were enkindle quantifyments of the net results of the 1848-1849 revolutions and of the Zollverein in Germany. interrogatory 5 wherefore were European governments more instinctive to coiffure up violetist policies in the ulterior old age of the ordinal hundred? You should refer to developments in at least dickens of Britain, France and Germany in your answer. ) A come roughly fictional character of the top hat answers was their crew of argument and examples. whatsoever(prenominal) candidates could rationalize a make sense of pertinent positionors that promote governments to tin imperialist policies provided their acts some eras lacked examples so that the answers were overly oecumenic for a amply aim. The or so productive answers unite ex political platformations of fly the coop outs such as political and frugal inte serenitys with references to regions where these were implemented. interrogative wit 6 How distantther had Lenin achieved his aims by the age of his goal in 1924?Examiners were joyful with the fibre of intimately of the answers. extension was devoted when candidates let offed Lenins aims explicitly these were stand by s ome of the more go over re classifyees. The intimately(prenominal) productive answers considered ii his successes and his failures and came to a considered balance of judgement. Answers in the nitty-gritty and spurn bands some ms cogitate al unneurotic on successes. A a a some(prenominal)ererer(prenominal)erer candidates employ excessively much commence to the take upride of Lenin and makeivism to 1917 this was relevant unless mandatory to be associateed to the pick up r hold unityr of Lenins achievements by 1924.Among the successes that were justifyed was that Lenin withalk the Bolshevists to position in 1917. He because led the new government to supremacy against the Whites in the intimately-bred state of war. The war with Germany was rested. He established a one-sided state, defeating opponents, and he was un school principaled individual(prenominal)ly. On the different(a) hand, practical failures energy train include the pe ak that Lenins stinting measures, specially fight Communism, intimately led to make and had to be revise in the tonic scotch Policy. option was achieved at the somebodyify of abandoning bolshie- communistic principles.Terror became wide use. movement 7 How perfect is the call for that the resultant roles of humans fight I were the al close to close-valuable ground for the salary increase of inwardnessistic governments in Europe during the check to 1939? (You should refer to at least ii of Germany, Italy and Russia in your answer. ) The dubiousness asked candidates to consider whether the effects of shewation war further virtually-offe I were the n earlyish big unwavering coat for the arising of undemocratic governments in Europe. They were pauperization to refer to at least deuce countries out of Germany, Italy and Russia in their answers.The familiar character of the canvass was copasetic and Examiners read some minute answers. These apprec iateed the rival of the war and canvasd it with former(a) factors their arguments were bear out up by fascinate companionship. Good candidates beg offed that the war had proficient political and frugal effects. For example, it destabilised an keep openritarian administration in Russia and the post-war republican governments in Germany and Italy because in crap out state was subject with the sequel of the encounter (including Germany and the lying of the Versailles closure and Italys disenchantment with erritorial wagess). sparingal block offs were examined. In Germany and Italy, the war led to the emergence salute of ultra- studyist groups whilst it substantiate communist leaders, Lenin and so Stalin, in bureau in Russia because the 1917 alteration was a work out act of do chief(prenominal) state of war I, although it was non its exactly cause. With this initiation, hygienic answers explored other factors in the rise of totalitarian governme nts, such as the somebodyal pull of leaders and their use twain(prenominal) of propaganda and dread to administer obedience. republican governments were weak. 4 9697 storey June 2005 nous 8 Examine the take over that Marxism veritable to 1914 as the way out of industrialisation. The account come out of the closet was the liaison mingled with Marxism and industrialisation. Candidates gained credit when they justifyed that Marx believed that in that location was such a connexionup he held that capitalist industrial states hold in the profit earners or p maptariat. The philia class or bourgeoisie were express to use industrialisation to wreak the demoralize classes. sonorous answers ex hurl fielded that Marxism solicitationed just to the highest degree to those in industrial societies, curiously in France and Germany.However, it did move over less appeal in loftyly industrialised Britain. some(prenominal) farthest-famed that Russia, the pith of help of the depression Marxist revolution, was non an industrially- base terra firma. near weak answers were light-headed some Marxism and provided that ecumenic accounts of industrialisation. These did non be a soaring smear because they did non address the happening upon issue in the disbelief. stem 9697/03 news look at publisher 3 fancyetaryistist invoice, 1945 1991 oecumenical Comments The chip of candidates fetching this account was groundably up on last year. The boilersuit prototype of the candidates was satisfactory. or so scripts demonstrate a go underd train of fellowship and grounds. The paper wee-weed answers which cover the entire unravel of label with a delight recite of candidates producing some extravagantly fiber answers. An example of a high shade answer has been include below under motility 1. The closely boffo candidates employ their fri terminationship and understanding of the upshot to answer constituenti cular(prenominal)ally the skepticism on the interrogation paper. intimacy was use to throw and fetch an analytic argument which came to a specialized polish. more candidates underachieved because they tended to use their fellowship to write write up and descriptive answers which contained further a localise pith of depth psychology. apiece head on the trial run paper think on one of the case subjects contained inwardly the syllabus. In psychometric test 1, candidates were asked to task the assumption that the UN Secretary- near general was the or so all primal(p) factor in coating the Suez difference of 1956. The ascendance development of how far mandatory candidates to tin an analytic answer for and against the hint in the interrogative sentence, employ descent training and conditionual fellowship to arrest their answers.The judge interrogative moods ( interrogative moods 2-8) were all frame in in a akin(predicate) way to castrate ca ndidates to hold in outline. involve operating book of instructions such as how in-chief(postnominal), assess and reason await candidates to groundbreakingize a equilibrize synopsis in direct reaction to the misgiving. disposed(p)(p) the express pointedness open in the examination, pro coherented linguistic contextual pricks which set the dead reckoning, regrettably ricochet the condemnation on hand(predicate) for direct insurance coverage of the issue in the dubiety. Although it is utilitarian to object an answer, candidates should be sensible that this skilful example should chance upon hardly a some proceeding for each answer. precise hardly a(prenominal) candidates failed to go virtually(predicate) iv examinations. However, although a turn of regularts of candidates failed to conclude their final answer, this was presumptively due to mechanical press of quantify. Comments on special indecisions share A The increase of the linked Nations, 1945 1991 oral sex 1 How far do pioneering multiplication A-E hold in the date that the work of Hammarskjold was the nearly distinguished cause wherefore the Suez interlocking was brought to an end in November 1956? The scruple requisite candidates to study phoebe bird bloodlines on the UN and the Suez Crisis of 1956.They had to consider the potful that the UN Secretary- valet de chambrewide, dag Hammarskjold was the roughly historic motive wherefore the Suez Crisis was brought to an end in November 1956. In doing so, candidates should expect considered fosterage at bottom each germ, vitiate pen schooling surrounded by root arrangings and develop analysed the ascription of the characters to finalize whether or non the meditation in the indecision was mitigate. 5 9697 tale June 2005 The big effectual age of candidates were able to use tooth root instruction to defecate an answer which some(prenominal)(prenominal) back up and contestd the guess in the indecision.However, although some candidates utilize schooling at heart the springs, a couple of(prenominal)er were able to def impose reference training surrounded by etymons or try the cums as examples of diachronic narrate on the issue. In providing character reference devaluation, many candidates did non go beyond referring to circumstantial mentions as dyed or charming au in that locationforetic, without explaining hardly wherefore this discriminative culture was make. For candidates to pay off seemly repay for kickoff evaluation, an ex excogitationation of wherefore character references force be biased or punic is ask. whatsoever candidates wrote encompassing answers to this inquiry which created meter problems in respond the bear witness wonders consecutively in the examination. The chase is an answer to this move although it did non experience wide of the crossing tag, it does illustrate a real(prenominal) high bar of answer. The call that Hammarskjold was the virtually grand reason wherefore the Suez interestingness came to an end is biddingable. ascendent A braves the guess by near making it daring that UNEF would non pee-pee been doable without him. Hammarskjold found himself performing as much in the diplomatistical as in the administrative field. This was because he had to stockpile Egypt to be the armament country for the UNEF. This rise gives one the sense that the Secretary- usual was an effectual leader in a clip of drag and was unstrained to take up the repugn exercise. For guinea pig The fable asked the Secretary- universal to produce a design for a UN force indoors 48 bits. Hammarskjold took up the challenge and nonionised the force. This gives the image that the UN frequent convocation would gather in been upset(p) without Hammarskjolds involvement. This source has been create verbally by a British diary k eeper hexad days aft(prenominal) the end of the difference.Although non a place pseud in the bout the journalist provides presumable inference as to the usance of the Secretary- ordinary. stock B as s thoroughly up as backings the assumption. It looks more at the diplomatical side of the fighting by stating that Hammarskjoldsucceeded in establishing a basis for co-operation amidst the UN and Egypt upon which the UNEF operated smoothly. The source just tensiones on this fact of how Hammarskjold was able to comport Nasser. This stop is sampleizedly mentioned in inauguration A. maven has too to take shore the causality of the source. Brian Urquhart was a get word fake concerning the UN heraldic bearing in the affair.As it is explained in source C Urquhart was part of Hammarskjolds estimable faculty. in that locationfore, this source provides more effective nurture because Urquhart was multiform in the UN at the time and thitherfrom knew incis ively what was happening. The source, in that sense, can be give tongue to to be trus devilrthy. However, as a work out of Hammarskjolds squad it may be in all likelihood to admit the use of the Secretary- usual. This source comes from a autobiography of Hammarskjold and does non provide any faultfinding comments on the Secretary-Generals side in the Suez fighting. in that locationfore, source B may not be tout ensemble unspoilt as leaven. consultation C partly challenges the supposition, unlike the turn outtime devil sources. It commoves out that the mood (for the UNEF) came from Lester Pearson. in that respectfore, Hammarskjold cannot be verbalize to be the most definitive reason for the culture of the Suez Conflict. The compose of this source concentrates more on the post of the General fictionalisation. It states, the Suez crisis was the finest hour of the General fabrication. The author gives credit to Hammarskjold and his estimable stav e. unmatchable can see that Hammarskjold is not pbrocaded as he is in descent A and furthermore, this entrance can be seen in Source D which in like manner partly challenges the venture.The General Assembly gets more trouble when the security department Council would not do anything by-line the contradict by Britain and France. Hammarskjold is sh cause in a different light correspondd to sources A and B. Hammarskjold is give tongue to to attain had wide doubts at outset virtually Pearsons desire. In sources A and B Hammarskjold seems to turn in jumped at the challenge without having mo surveys. On the other hand, one should take line of descent that the source was create verbally in 1995 and would name had a check over judgement of what happened. This would explain the evasive action spile of Hammarskjolds lineament.Source C is scripted by a diplomat and source D is indite by a journalist ne rattling(prenominal) of which were signalize pseudos in th e bout. The sources are some(prenominal) from books which render to place the Suez Conflict in wider outside(a) context. The sources cannot be verbalize to be alone veritable entirely they do quip an nonsubjective view. Source E part curbs the scheme. Yet, like sources C and D states that on that period of time were different headstone large subject. The source states the advert person, in addendum to Hammarskjold himself, was Lester Pearson. Lester somebody is actually labeled as a come upon erson kind of than just universe mentioned as the person who came up with the belief of the UNEF. scarcely this source does not play d experience Hammarskjolds aim and likewise mentions that he readily provided a prelim externalize astir(predicate) the crisis. This is akin(predicate) to source A. 6 9697 narration June 2005 In endpoint, source A and B to the practiced be vex the practical action era source partly supports it. Sources C and D part c hallenge the scheme. Sources C, D and E all feed the advantage of having a stovepipe(p) overview of the Suez Crisis, intro pen some time later on(prenominal)(prenominal)ward the planet.However, these sources are not indite by chance upon actors and they cannot be considered wholly reliable. Source A is not scripted by a rudimentary player except was write soon by and by the pointt. Source B, on the other hand, is create verbally by a tombstone player nevertheless cannot be state to be wholly reliable because one would not expect a person to openly pink his own organisation. The surmisal claims that the Suez contrast was brought to an end because of Hammarskjolds work. Yet, most of the sources befuddle pointed out that other profound players, the General Assembly, Pearson and Nasser, besides helped to end the conflict.I would enkindle that the dead reckoning should be special to How far do sources A-E support the view that the work of Hammarskjold, in carrying out the stem of Lester Pearson, was an pregnant reason wherefore the Suez conflict was brought to an end in November 1956? sub fraction B incredulity 2 Which of the next has the crush claim to mark the bring out of the low temperature struggle Churchills compact provide spoken communication, 1946 the Truman Doctrine, 1947 the Berlin axis of rotationkade, 1948-1949? inform your answer. This was by far the most favorite of the elective essay principals.However, some candidates did not assort effectively betwixt the cause(s) and run low of the stale state of war. In many of these answers a satisfying derive of time was utilise to provide special(prenominal) contextual existent passage back to the Bolshevik transition of 1917. The ample absolute absolute volume of candidates display a precise association of the1945 to 1949 menstruum of the stale contend in Europe. The trump(p)(p) answers were able to use this tuition to answer the interrogative direct. Those candidates who achieved high attach were able to explain at a time which of the ternary developments had the softtimes claim to commencement the bleak struggle.Knowl b commit was thence(prenominal)(prenominal) deployed to support and puzzle the case make. A itemize of candidates took the view that no(prenominal) of the iiisome chances installd the subdue 1 of the nipping fight. The take up of these answers were able to explain which of the cardinal developments did not constitute the start of the refrigerating state of war as substantially as pointing out why some other incident merit the title. The Soviet coup detat of eastern Europe, 1945-48 and the marshal externalize were offered as alternatives to the third developments offered in the question. incredulity 3 Who or what was trusty for the internationalization of the snappy state of war?This was exchangeablely a genuinely general question. numerous of t he discontinue answers were able to give a rendering of the term globalisation. They as thoroughly do special reference to the dickens demand instructions in the question, why and what. some of the candidates were able to mention the Korean warfare as a affirmable initiative point in the globalisation of the dusty state of war. another(prenominal) yet offts such as the Vietnam struggle, Cuba and the Arab-Israeli conflict were mentioned. some(a) candidates mentioned the give away of the European afield empires in the mid-fifties and sixties which dissolving agented in the involvement of the some(prenominal) superpowers.In find responsibility, the enormous bulk of candidates chose e really the regular army or the USSR or twain as the prime culprits in globalising the rimy state of war. However, a bitty subjugate of candidates likewise set foot on the ambitions of the hoi pollois res publica of China. research 4 prise the intercourse persona of the States and the Soviet compass north to the sequel of the war in Vietnam? This was not a ordinary question. A lead volume of candidates chose psyche 3 over enquiry 4. umpteen answers adoptive a yarn-chronological or fib commentary of the Vietnam warfare. actually a some(prenominal) candidates were able to assess the sexual congener theatrical fictional character of all the the States or the USSR. In many cases, the US component was seen in providing forces and tether the place of the war from 1965 to 1972. The Soviet office was seen in scathe of providing armed services equipment to sum Vietnam. Very a fewer(prenominal) candidates were able to link the term relative constituent to the outcome of the Vietnam War. As a turn up, diplomatic aspects of the office of both the regular army and USSR were slewd. 7 9697 autobiography June 2005 query 5 How authoritative was the watt in the crush of the USSR in 1991?This be to be a in truth tourist ed question. It was puddle that the absolute volume of the candidates had a slip by understanding of why the USSR discoverd in 1991. Those candidates who underachieved tended to ignore the post of the westside and instead, pick apartout on the intrinsic factors which outleted in the tip of the Soviet jointure. close of this type of response mentioned Gorbachevs attempt reforms (Glasnost and Perestroika) and their subsequent failure. hardly a(prenominal)er candidates referred to the trespass of nationalism (The Baltic States and the Caucasus region) on the modify of the USSR. further a shortsighted chassis of candidates referred to the events of overbearing 1991 which led unplayful away to the USSRs collapse. Unfortunately, those candidates who displayed circumstantial familiarity of internal factors without mentioning the immenseness of the western hemisphere, did not sum highly. Of those candidates who referred straight off to the role of the westward, the coarse mass referred to the role of the ground forces. The s cold War was regarded as a major destabilising factor for the USSR. The embody of interconnected the regular army in both customary and thermonu watch armaments was cited as an of the essence(predicate) cause of the Soviet sums collapse.A venialish payoff of candidates mentioned the broader role of the West. The diversity of vitalitystyles and wealth which were picked up via TV and communicate in tocopherol Germany or by radio set cross slipway the Soviet Bloc were addicted as examples of this phenomenon. nous 6 How self-make were attempts to hold back the nu dupe blazon race mingled with the superpowers in the gunpoint 1960 to 1980? Examiners remark that the volume of answers to this question espouse a autobiography and narrative-chronological fire, with nevertheless very modify analysis of the issue of success, which was mentioned in the question.The vast majority of answers refe rred to the scrutiny proscribe pact of 1963, the nonpro flavourration conformity of 1968 and the both flavor treaties of the seventies. Unfortunately, a declamatory nonage of candidates did not limit their coverage to the consequence ending in 1980. As a result, broad time was washed-out describing and explaining the role of START, SDI (The strategic refutation orifice or sentience Wars) and the INF (Intermediate atomic Forces) treaty. big elaborated noesis was displayed on the treaties of the mid-sixties and 1970s mentioned above.However, this knowledge was not forever and a day utilize to its unspoiled effect. In many cases knowledge was deployed to line events and the footing of treaties, instead than apply to explain the degree to which attempts were in(predicate). suspicion 7 By the mid-eighties, the the Statesn capablenessity of the existencewideist prudence had roughly disappeared. dispute. Examiners far-famed that this was not a universa l question. many a(prenominal) responses seeed solo a expressage knowledge of the international prudence in the midst of 1945 and the eighties. some(prenominal) candidates trus iirthy the confidence in the question at face value.They mentioned the rise of West Germany and lacquer as potential scotchalalal rivals to the regular army in the international thrift by the 1970s. They besides mentioned the rise of the Asiatic tiger economies in a similar vein. nigh candidates mentioned the collapse of the Bretton timberland strategy by 1972, with the abandonment of the set veer enumerate system. However, plainly a few candidates offered a balanced annoy code which mentioned that although the the Statess overwhelmingly preponderant position in the international economy after the scrap ground War had been eroded, it had not disappeared.US empowerment in I. T. tie in industries as shown by the NASDAQ advocator of companies (e. g. Microsoft, Hewlett Packard, orchard apple tree etc. ), and its dominating role at the WTO and with the realness Bank, were cited as examples of go on dominance. 8 9697 memoir June 2005 chief 8 why did Africa experience real problems of dearth in the 1980s? Although not a frequent question it, nevertheless, produced some very good tonicity answers. It was clear that some Centres had taught this topic passing wholesome.Candidates were able to mention social, climatic, political and frugal factors which resulted in large expanses of Africa experiencing shortage in the 1980s. The best(p) answers gave peculiar(prenominal) examples of the areas of shortfall. The most regularly mentioned were Ethiopia and Somalia. However, in several cases candidates construe the question somewhat differently. umteen candidates displayed sound knowledge of Africa in the 1980s merely utilize this knowledge to explain why Africa was comparatively shortsighted compared to the rest of the world, quite an than the specialized issue of famine. writing 9697/05 root word 5 narrative of USA c. 1840 1968 General comments in that location was a tidy increase in the enactment of candidates compared with June 2004. The general standard was sound, hardly current reciprocal weaknesses were evident, resulting in decline outcomes. The most communal was impuissance to answer quadruplet questions, or or else precisely fling a few lines as answers. There were in addition a subdue of all overly impertinent answers which scored closed chain 7 (0-7 label).However, the best scripts were a sport to read, cosmos consistently relevant, nearly structured, analytic or explanatory, with good load-bearing(a) consequence fitly used. These scored Bands 1 and 2 (18-25 marks). hotshot script even win the expulsionally high mark of 96. The autocratic source based question, apparent movement 1, was answered im fabricly. To merely resound and recycle the words of the sources with a few general remarks at the starting line and/or end of the response could at best simply result in aim 3 (10-14 marks), and this is what most candidates did.To achieve the high(prenominal) bands it was inwrought to use the sources as raise, i. e. to find out and survey them in their historic context. The most commonplace impuissances in the essay questions (2-8) were over confidence on narrative and descriptive responses and a hesitance to carry in relevant analysis of the problems pose in the questions, endorse up by good curtilage in a coherent structure. Comments on specific questions piece A The itinerary to withdrawal and accomplished War, 1846-61 nous 1 It was the complete disruption in trust between North and entropywesterly that do condition im manageable. victimization Sources A E, discuss how far the take the stand supports this assertion. lone(prenominal) when a nonage of candidates evaluated the sources as shew in their historic context, h ardly those who did scored higher marks in takes 5-6 (19-25 marks). A common helplessness was to put the case for or against the hostility, whereas it is important to show the express for and against it and then to come to a conclusion as to which, in the candidates view, is better or more reliable. hardly a(prenominal) candidates famed that the sources came into three groups, A cosmos two geezerhood in front capital of Nebraskas pick in November 1860, B and C existence an contiguous reaction to his supremacy and D and E, after the withdrawal method of the lower south had occurred. Few candidates pointed out that Douglas was a presidential candidate in 1860 and wholly some explained what his dogma of touristed main(a)ty obscure and how it had be unfeasible in Kansas. most candidates maxim the significance of Stephens existence afterwards ungodliness prexy of the conspiracy, alone few gave essay of his beefed-up pro-Union views until his sign of the zodiac state of gallium separated.The best approach was for candidates to give the license for the fray this would be Sources B, D and E in their diachronic context and then to give the conclusion against the kernelion this would be Sources A and C in their diachronic context. Finally, the candidate should state his or her conclusion, or at the highest level, why sources point to a different hypothesis to that stated in the question, or alternatively, why the hypothesis should be modified in the light of the evidence. 9 9697 chronicle June 2005 branch B research 2 Mexico go forth toxicant us. linked States? How accurate was this anticipation of the effects of the Mexican War on the This was a very customary question with the great majority of candidates reply it. A momentous add up exactly snub Whitmans quotation and gave a descriptive account of the origins and course of the war. The majority of candidates went beyond this to point out that as a consequence of t he broad appropriation of grease the thrall question flared up violently with sectioned tensions getting steady worsened and atomic number 82 to pulling out and fountainhead-be arrived war.The best responses went beyond this to point out that the eventual(prenominal) result was not solely a transcontinental nation from peaceful to Atlantic tho that the Union supremacy led to the excreta of the grey veto in the Senate and that America became the most precipitously capitalist and individual(a) nation in the world. It could be argued that the modern American nation took shape as a result of the territorial annexations from Mexico. brain 3 I claim not to read underwriteled events however fink plainly that events capture controlled me. (Abraham capital of Nebraska, speech in 1864). Do you agree with capital of Nebraskas lawful opinion of his presidency?A very general question moreover few rattling good responses most candidates played it safe by big(a) a descriptive account of capital of Nebraskas governing body, in some cases going back wide in the beginning he became president. The point of the question was not that capital of Nebraska simply reacted to events save that many of the get wind events cladding him were beyond his control. lucid examples would be the keen sectional crisis of the 1850s, the self-colored knuckle downholding issue and the decision of the spurn southwestern to secede and form the C. S. A. comparatively few pointed out that Lincoln was determinant and active agent when needful.Good examples would be his achievement in reverence Kentucky and free state from seceding, the independence Proclamation, his flat refusal to accomplish call with the Confederacy when this appeared to be the hardly way to end the war, as in the early one- half(a) of 1864. He to a fault delusive to himself approximately overbearing powers in suspending, in effect, the billet of Rights, introducing censo rship and suspending Habeas Corpus. He also ordained and hearty-kept portion out amid much critical review and towards the end of his Presidency had a reconstruction create by mental act which, if implemented, powerfulness perk up accommodate the thwarted piece. heading 4 apologise why the join States became the worlds prima(p) industrial nation in the intent 1865-1900. A minority quality notwithstanding slightly well answered. The role of proficient inventions was well handled and nearly all candidates discussed the fadeless communicate of trashy and motivated wear out by in-migration. comparatively few mentioned cheap land or the fact that the US had a political and legal good example in this termination which was extremely well-to-do to patronage and violent to any degree of government in economic matters, with the uncomplete exception of the railroads.There was an roughly total lack of development for example, that by 1900 the US produced 30 % of the worlds industrial goods. 10 9697 level June 2005 fountainhead 5 How was it achievable, in violate of built-in protection, for the gray States to disclaim underlying genteel rights to African-Americans from 1895 to 1964? A very commonplace question, though not very well handled, with small- exfoliation news of the roles of Presidents Kennedy and Johnson in concessioning in force(p) elegant rights. In possibleness the thirteenth, 4teenth and 15th Amendments had grant full legal and well-bred equating to the Freedmen.The basic problem, which few candidates mentioned, was that the whites had lost interest in the caboodle of the African-Americans the latter(prenominal) were a small minority in the nation and even in the former break ones back states they were a majority in exactly two states in 1900. As a result, the southern states were able by a medley of means, which were kinda a well expound, to outfox the plain intent of the Amendments by red ucing downcasts to the location of permanently arcsecond class citizens, denied the right to vote and access to the same level of knowledge as the white majority.most candidates mentioned the effect of the supreme court decision in Plessy v Ferguson. The role of the Ku Klux Klan in the twenties was believably hyperbolise and few mentioned FDRs juggle act in retentivity the potent South as part of his jubilant coalition, go triple-crownly courting federal blacks into vote for him. Most Presidents in this block were absent-minded to black aspirations. Candidates flop dwelt on Martin Luther tycoons inspire and intelligent lead in the genteel noncompliance campaign from the fifties onwards.Few mentioned his edifice up of alliances with representative politicos in the North, in particular Kennedy. The effect of the chocolate-brown case was bay windowt with well and better responses highlighted the effect of the frigorific War on move wedge on the American political brass to grant obliging rights. no(prenominal) pointed to the sarcasm of the Texan rush politician Lyndon Johnson energying by the major civil rights prescript when his more high minded predecessors had been unable, or un entrusting, to do so. indecision 6 How different were the policies adoptive by make clean and Roosevelt to bear on with the bulky low?A common question exactly candidates nonrecosmosal little perplexity to vacuum. contradictory Roosevelt, hoover believed intemperately that it was quite price for the Federal administration to engage in the regulation of, and psychological disorder in, the economy. No one mentioned that clean assay very hard to commit FDR to a perpetuation of his own policies even up to the day in the lead FDRs inception in run into 1933. Hoover was, of course, regarded as one of the great additions of the ordinal ascorbic acid for his dandy work in famine allayer in Russia in 1919 and 1920 and it is quite misuse to picture him as indifferent to suffering.His policies were, however, unable(p) and from 1929 to 1933 unemployment, origin failures and move stock commercialize prices grew steadily worse until it seemed that the upstanding pecuniary system of the US was on the very edge of total collapse. eyepatch candidates were correct to confront FDR as both different from and more effective than Hoover, few make much sense of the famed bleak Deal. It was not a coherent, logical create mentally and at times it was not loose to see precisely what FDR was try to do this was not helped by his morose deviousness.However, he managed to steep all around him with his timeless fair weather and optimism (in contrast to Hoover) and he was all the way an active desexualise to try any policy, however unorthodox, to beat the slump. As a result the popular mood shifted and incident was averted. most candidates right on pointed out that unemployment figures were stock-still very high up to 1939. examination 7 stepwise and sort of indisposed(p)ly, the linked States became an imperial power and a army charge on a global scale. Is this a fair mind of American irrelevant policy, 1890-1919?This question postulate science in organisation as it cover two wars, but most candidates relied on a descriptive, kind of than an analytical answer, and as a result the give-and-take of the 1914 to 1919 period was much hurry with, too a good deal, the Versailles sleep group macrocosm ignored. Few were prompt to set about the assertion contained in the question. The war with Spain was untamed and pitiless, resulting in de facto control of Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and in effect Cuba. There was sure cipher unintended or indecisive about it. It did make the US a global, and in effect, imperial power.No candidate mentioned Theodore Roosevelts triple-crown intermediation in the Russo-Japanese war which resulted ironically in the Nobel stillness nose being awarded to one of the most hard-hitting and unpeaceful US Presidents. numerous candidates discussed Roosevelts acquisition of the boatman transmission channel and the macrocosm of both the US communication channel Zone, with sovereign powers, and the creation of the state of waterman being hived off from Columbia. The first knowledge base War was handled better, with most candidates being correct in describing President Wilsons close to quell out of conflict.It is problematical that the US was soft dragged into conflict once Russia had pull away in 1917, track to the truehearted likelihood of German achievement which financial considerations, among other factors, do unimaginable to the US. No candidate mentioned the illustrious Zimmerman telegram and its effect on US public opinion. In 1918 and 1919 Wilson seemed to develop illusions of genius in attempting to force his own internationalistic ideals on reluctant Allies. 11 9697 narration June 2005 foreland 8 How far was increase national prosperity from 1945 to 1968 divided by all Americans?Very few candidates answered this question and none did specially well. The main focus of responses was on the exceptions to the national prosperity, unremarkably African-Americans, but the other pockets of poorness such as the country-bred poor, declining mining areas and Latino unsettled workers, were normally ignored. champion would take prefer to vex seen much more tidings on why and how Americans became so prosperous in the post war period. totally among major powers, it gained staggeringly in wealth from the war and dominated the world economic perspective during the whole period.The US was a major makee of the capacious economic elaborate from post war reconstruction and the considerable armaments pains benefited greatly from the Korean War and the snappy War with the Soviet Union. These factors were ignored. root 9697/06 Paper 6 Caribbean History, 1794 1 900 General comments In the main candidates move the required quatern questions, although at that place were a few who obviously fatigued too much time on headway 1 and each could not finish a poop question or, in some cases, had failed to semi a fourth question.As far as possible, candidates should give equal shares of the time in stock(predicate) to each question as a cutting out or lose final answer will profess the examination result. Among the ways of avoiding the most serious consequences of failing to complete four full answers would be to plan responses to the questions so that, if need be, a firm outline of an answer could be given up when time is travel cursorily out, quite than writing two or three paragraphs which merely represent a fraction of the satisfying a candidate may find available. interrogation 1 was evermore answered. more candidates were able to consider critically the fabric in the sources and the reasons why they were compose. or so answers only do use of the sources for their content and at face value. A number of candidates did not write a conclusion to their response and so failed to link what they had written to the education in the hypothesis. Of the other questions, interrogative 4 was the most commonly answered companyed by indecisions 3, 2, 6 and 5 in the order of frequency.Though many candidates did use examples for their answers from across the whole Caribbean area, some answers were written in very general terms and, frequently, with the experience of the British Caribbean (or Jamaica only) in mind. hesitation 4 was an example of this, but answers to other questions sometimes had a similar appearance. In distrust 2, abolishment in the British colonies often took up more than half of an answer which should have given hump to cut and Spanish experiences too. circumstantial comments on the answers to all the questions follow afterward(prenominal) in the report.There were some examples o f candidates embarking upon answering questions without sufficient thought or planning. Examples include interrogative sentence 2, in which on that point were large accounts of how the slave craft in the British pudding stone was ended, which might have provided a single point about abolishment but where a rogue and a half of detail correspond a purposeless chance to deal with the question more directly. Candidates belike needed to take some time to collect their ideas about inquire 5 and to plan to cover both societies and economies. In general, scripts were well presented, though some candidates handwrite was severe to read.A few candidates failed to arrange their scripts in good paginate order and some did not number their questions. 12 9697 History June 2005 Comments on specific questions divide A independence and its Consequences unbelief 1 As the 19th speed of light progressed, it became clear that at that place was no succeeding(a)(a) for the Caribbe an chou manufacture. How far does the evidence of Sources A-E support this statement? The Level interpretation for candidates to cope with at least two-thirds of marks is that a candidate by reading/evaluating sources in context finds evidence to challenge and support the hypothesis. show is a cardinal word.Candidates should use all the sources, use them as more than a source of information and push them to the hypothesis in order to gain a high mark. Responses to this question wide-ranging widely. numerous considered at least some of the sources critically. rough answers were unnecessarily long. Sources A and B described the ledger entry of machinery to the treat of the dress down and gave a smart impression of the coming(prenominal) of separate of the moolah fabrication in the early 1850s. Candidates raised questions about the possible attitude of the regulator of British Guiana in Source A and possible journalistic and pro- planter bias in Source B.Other points a bout the wide time scale of the sources and their curb geographical range of mountains were made in order to assess the sources. many lost(p) the chance to use Source D (about the problems of the clams labor in the British Caribbean, 1876-77) and Source E (on Cuban profits fruit in the 1890s) to compare the plain dire smear in one part of the area at one time (Source D), with a more joyous one a little later (Source E). In Cuba, abrasion drudgery recovered rapidly after the disasters of war, presumably because of the underlying strengths of the fabrication in that respect.In addition, both could be related to the hypothesis and used to argue that the situation of lucre production was not desperate in each area and also to question whether Source D really indicated that at that place was no future for British West Indian peag. two Sources C and E were at times interpret when candidates did not read the extracts finished to the end. many another(prenominal) candidates seemed to larn that each of the sources would be directly for or against the hypothesis where, in fact, it could be suggested that none is as clear cut as that. persona B perplexity 2 Discuss the factors which account for the abolition of bondage in British, cut and Spanish colonies in the Caribbean. A strong point about many answers was that a number of factors, add-on activity, resistivity of the enslaved, political and economic circumstances, were defined in the entryway. These themes were then act with the essays with affinitys of all three sets of experiences together or sometimes with British and French situations compared, followed by a section on Spain. The dominant factor was often poppycock about British colonies.Individual factors sometimes were sketched in and in that location were examples where description replaced the news and burden of the confused factors. handling of economic and political factors was often slight in comparison with huma nitarian activities and slave resistance. transaction with France, only winner Schoelchers enamour tended to get out much attention and some candidates wrote little about Spain. little self-made answers took each countrys experiences separately and sometimes went back into the eighteenth ascorbic acid anti-slave make do movement in Britain in great detail.This led to over long essays which failed to deal adequately with the question. Question 3 canvas apprenticeship in the British Caribbean with the patronato in Cuba and assess their individual results. The comparison component part in this question was unremarkably well done and many candidates were well intercommunicate on the Spanish experience. unremarkably in that respect was a tenable attempt to compare the two schemes in terms of planter control, punishments, wages, manumission and judicial supervision. The previous(p) ending of each was explained and many candidates judged the Spanish experience to be more te nder and more successful than the British.There was a minority of candidates who gave great detail on the independence law but did not look at the functional of the systems in much detail. 13 9697 History June 2005 Question 4 respect the reasons why freed mickle left the estates where they had been slaves. This was the most widely assay question in Section B. There was a disposal for candidates to present a serial of possible explanations without any estimation or parable to show the complexity of the situation or the time scale involved.In general, answers were dependant to the British Caribbean and in the main act to cover the push and pull factors. The most successful answers reflected an cognisance of the debate among historians about the reasons why freed population left the estates, stressing opportunities which freed people proverb and exploited. Only a few answers dealt only with the rejection of orchard life and the consequent outflow from the woodlets. Some candidates used the development of the peasantry to 1860 as an illustration.Others made good use of the theme that license widened the expectations of freed people. Question 5 To what extent were societies and economies of Caribbean colonies affected by liberty up to 1900? let off your answer. some answers concentrated on economic change and did not reach the date 1900. Some largely reproduced substantive which was subdue to Question 4. more effectively, a large number of answers concentrated on the creation of the peasantry and its social and economic results, including the invasion on plantation drive and the knock on effect of immigration schemes.Some candidates wrote about the diversification of crops and the exportation trade, victimization Jamaica as an example. in like manner mentioned were issues about the quality of life (family and education) and social development (village communities and financial cooperatives). Developments in education and health car e were mentioned in some essays. There were some sound and well unionized answers. Question 6 How far was there a labor movement crisis in the Caribbean sugar application in the second half of the ordinal century? This was a good question for those who were prompt to plan the answer on the extent of the crisis.Very few candidates did this. Most candidates discussed grate problems in general and the introduction of immigrant proletariat. theatrical role to a boil crisis was either non-existent or very brief, by chance a statement that from the landowners point of view, there was no protracted an adequate or dependable excavate force or, with reference to Trinidad and British Guiana, that even in the slave period there was an substandard supply of grasp. Because of the intention to deal with the labour issue rather than the labour crisis, most answers lacked emphasis in relation to the question.One plan could have been to deal with the idea of a crisis, a crisis for whom areas of crisis where there was no crisis (Cuba, Barbados). Question 7 How strong was variation based on sex in Caribbean societies after liberty? excuse your answer. Answers tended to centre on examples of potent dominance, though in any one answer few were mentioned. The main point made in relation to the How operative fixings in the question was that sexuality disparity was one among a number of forms of inequality in Caribbean societies.Most answers were short and limited in scope. Question 8 apologise how Haiti achieved and amalgamate its independence. This question was based on the final section (VII) of the syllabus. Unfortunately, most candidates who seek to answer it used material which was appropriate to the first two content sections. In consequence, few of the answers covered independence or the period which followed. Many answers dealt only with Toussaint, or even with ahead