Rizzi’s The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery and his Locality and t

In the two articles, Rizzi’s The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery and his Locality and the Left Periphery, there does not seem to be any incompatibility but instead a steady focus on fist elucidating the structure of the left and using the left to refine the Relativized Minimality principle. The major issue is that issues presented in the first are not necessarily addressed in the second, like details about the null constant. The second paper can be viewed as an additional paper that relies, to some degree, on the information presented in the first, like the overall structure and some of the adverbial analyses. To that extent, it builds off of 1997. One of the main aims of Rizzi 1997 is â€Å"to explore some aspects of the fine structure of the left periphery† and â€Å"to postulate an articulated array of X-bar projections which will be assumed to constitute the complimentizer system†(Rizzi 1997:281). He also addresses some of â€Å"the adjacency and anti-adjacency effects involving elements of the C system and different kinds of fillers of the subject position (overt DP, PRO, trace) which are that are amenable to an explanation in terms of the assumed structure of the C system†. Rizzi (1997) depends on a few features, that syntactic movement is â€Å"last resort† or that it must be a necessary â€Å"quasi-morphological† requirement, and that these requirements are Criteria requirements, â€Å"the presence of a head entering into the required Spec-head configuration with the preposed phrase†. Criteria requirements, unlike feature checking, will not disappear. Finally, Rizzi must also assume within the relativized minimality theory, Empty Category Principle (ECP), and the Head Movement Constraint (HMC) and therefore head government. The rele... ...new structure for the left periphery that looks like this: Force Top* Int Top* Focus Mod* Top* Fin IP This template helps account for all of the different effects. We see these in examples (25), (26), (32-41), and (63). Adverbs are normally modifiers and quantifiers, and trigger minimality effects in wh-chains. Some belong only to the modifiers, like attentivement, and therefore do not have an effect on quantificational chains (Rizzi 2004: 244). â€Å"Simple adverb preposing targets the Mod position†, but can also target â€Å"the ordinary Focus position† and â€Å"negation belongs to both the quantificational class and the modifier class†(Rizzi 2004:244). This is one of the main differences between the first and second paper, the further analysis of the overall structure of the left periphery and how adverbs both help make it clear and how it explains their placement.